
Bill Gates Visits Indonesia: For the People or a Hidden Agenda?
The Gates-Prabowo Meeting Raises Public Questions
Bill Gates once again drew public attention in Indonesia. On Wednesday, May 7, 2025, he met with President Prabowo Subianto in what was described as a high-level humanitarian mission. But the public is asking: is this truly about health aid, or is there another narrative hidden behind the scenes?
Focus on Health and Nutrition
A major highlight of the visit was the Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG). Backed by a massive state budget of IDR 450 trillion through 2029, the program aims to benefit millions of children and pregnant women. Gates expressed his support, with the Gates Foundation promising to help enhance the program’s impact and delivery.
Additionally, the Gates Foundation is developing a tuberculosis (TB) vaccine, with clinical trials scheduled in two locations in Indonesia. The vaccine has shown 50% effectiveness in phase 2b trials. Gates also announced a plan to distribute specialized micronutrient supplements for pregnant women in the coming months.
The Trust Fund and Elitism Concerns
Another key discussion point was the government’s plan to launch the Danantara Trust Fund, a social investment fund targeted to grow to US$1 billion. Gates was invited as a global partner. However, the presence of several business tycoons at the private meeting triggered public concerns: is this initiative truly people-focused, or driven by elite interests?
Public Voices and Critical Responses
Social media erupted with mixed reactions. While some praised the government’s decisive moves, others questioned Gates’ intentions. Accusations that Indonesia is becoming a “testing ground for vaccines” resurfaced. The plan to award Gates Indonesia’s highest civilian honor was also criticized, with many asking why local heroes aren’t being recognized instead.
Bill Gates’ visit brought both hope and controversy. Behind the headlines of health and philanthropy, the public demands transparency and genuine citizen involvement in policymaking. Without it, this partnership risks becoming another elite showcase with the people left on the sidelines.
Responses